3 ms·
If you think twitter made even 1% difference in 2016 I urge you to go and touch some grass. This stuff doesn't matter.
by mvdtnz 1y ago
If you think twitter made even 1% difference in 2016 I urge you to go and touch some grass. This stuff doesn't matter.
- aaronax 1y agoWay more likely that it was /r/the_donald. In my humble, biased opinion--since I was around there but never really active on Twitter.
- JSteph22 1y agoBut Trump won more convincingly in 2024 without it? That doesn't support your argument.
- lesuorac 1y agoTrump won by <1% in an election against a candidate who lost her only attempt at a primary and during a time period where western incumbents saw a 10+% drop due to their handling of covid inflation. 2024 isn't a story of how Trump outwitted his opponents but one of how his opponents tied their shoelaces together.
- lynx97 1y agoThat is so true, and needs to be repeated more. DJT didn't win because he was so great. DJT won because the DMC candidate was so hilariously bad.
- raydev 1y agoThere weren't a lot of 50+ year old folks on Reddit in 2016. Now there are, but that's because they've aged into that range.
- ahmeneeroe-v2 1y agoDJT's use of Twitter in 2016 allowed him to operate within his opponents' OODA loops. DJT and his supporters could craft narratives directly, rather than going through traditional media. DJT's information flow: DJT -> Twitter-based Supporters -> News Orgs -> Electorate Other Candidate's info flows: Candidate -> News Orgs -> Electorate So not only could DJT move faster, but he also didn't need permission/buy-in from Editors/Owners of news orgs.
- HDThoreaun 1y agoTrumps ability to control the narrative is pretty much wholly based on his tweeting skills. He is legitimately a top tier tweeter up there with @dril and the likes. It is incredibly entertaining and end of the day that’s what politics is about now.
- amitrip 1y ago[dead]