4 ms·
You'd be insane to leave a job with such few responsibilities and such insane compensation. Set for life.
by snickerdoodle12 1y ago
You'd be insane to leave a job with such few responsibilities and such insane compensation. Set for life.
- ceejayoz 1y agoUnless you think said job is edging into "oh shit I might be part of the Nuremberg Trials II" territory. Life got short for quite a few historical Nazis.
- snickerdoodle12 1y agoSure, and I agree, but that's not really related to what GP is saying
- ceejayoz 1y agoIt's related to what you are saying. It's a non-monetary reason it'd be non-insane to leave the role; "set for life" doesn't do you much good if you're in The Hague.
- snickerdoodle12 1y agoNo, it's not. Here, I'll repeat the context for you: > > Arguably a competent person wouldn't have persisted in a role where it was obvious they were not able to make a meaningful difference. > You'd be insane to leave a job with such few responsibilities and such insane compensation. Set for life. Pay special attention to the phrasing "a role". We are not talking about specifically this role.
- ceejayoz 1y ago> You'd be insane to leave a job with such few responsibilities and such insane compensation. Set for life. Again: you would not be insane to do so if staying in the job has substantial non-compensation consequences. Like jail.
- toomanyrichies 1y agoSome might argue there are more important things in life than compensation. Self-respect, for example.