4 ms·
Thank you! Then I’d say this just points to a concerning lack of understanding of the security model on the implementer’s side. In an ideal world, there would
by lxgr 1y ago
Thank you!
Then I’d say this just points to a concerning lack of understanding of the security model on the implementer’s side.
In an ideal world, there would of course only be on-card verification, but resource constraints on smart card chips are still a factor.
In the second best of all worlds, Oracle would have one reference implementation each for trusted and for untrusted byte code, and a big bold disclaimer on when to use which, but I’m not convinced even that would prevent against all possible implementation mistakes.