33 ms·
I would have agreed a few weeks ago. But I can't anymore, the limitation I see is scope size and not capability. And available context sizes will just get bigge
by herbst 1y ago
I would have agreed a few weeks ago. But I can't anymore, the limitation I see is scope size and not capability. And available context sizes will just get bigger
- leray_J 1y agoWell, until Claude Code ends the game(maybe in a few months), yeah. Today we're not there yet, even with full codebase knowledge. At least from my experience and how I want it to be done. For some, the damage has already been done. Wait & see !
- herbst 1y agoI've seen it do so stupid things I am still afraid running each query. It honestly kinda stressful to keep up with, when it starts breaking things. More like a super fast trainee than a coworker to depend on. Yet do damn efficient to work with
- GuySake 1y agoHave you seen LLM play chess? They would not best an average 6 years old who just learned the rules. I doubt giving them more context would help. There are some thing you can't just parrot your way out. And I would easily argue that it's harder to copy the behavior of a good software engineer than it is to copy the moves of a good chess players. Not even talking about understanding the business logic you are actually implementing. Which LLM seems as far as understanding chess.
- herbst 1y agoAs I see it I am directing it while constantly watching, controlling and questioning it. I wouldnt let it do anything on larger code bases, but building highly specialized services or components IS crazy efficient, when you question ever move.