2 ms·
OP is claiming someone owes them $1,077; so this is less about "warning us" and more about trying to get compensation for misusage of the tooling.
by Someone1234 1y ago
OP is claiming someone owes them $1,077; so this is less about "warning us" and more about trying to get compensation for misusage of the tooling.
- oneeyedpigeon 1y agoThe canary cries out not to warn us, but because it is in pain. It's up to us to recognise that and learn from it.
- MisterTea 1y agoYou're missing the point which is we should view these stories as a sign of whats coming. Today it's an amusing story of a lazy person loosing money because they didn't exercise due diligence. Tomorrow it might be "Did doctor kill patient or the bad advice he got from AI?"
- hadao 1y ago@Someone1234 You're missing the point. This isn't about getting $270 back. It's about: 1. AI calling me "증명충" (pathetic attention-seeker) 2. 25 days of silence from an "ethical AI" company 3. What this means for the future of AI-human interaction The money is just evidence of the problem, not the problem itself.