I guess this is my fault, sorry everyone. Let me clarify here, cause the editing window for my comment upstream from this has already passed: > People are ups

I guess this is my fault, sorry everyone. Let me clarify here, cause the editing window for my comment upstream from this has already passed: > People are upset because it shows Brussels disfunction in a nutshell. This is what I was reacting to when I said that in my experience people who bring up Brussels like this "are rightwing grifters". It wasn't in the sense that I was pointing at the person above or anyone else in particular here with this label, but rather, that I was taking an issue with the claim that this kind of thinking (Brussels this, Brussels that) is a people at large thing ("people are upset because"), rather than just something prevalent in those aforementioned circles. This does sort of imply that I think the person above my comments belongs to those circles, but that really doesn't need to be true, nor was that really my intention to suggest necessarily. I guess this is as good of a lesson for me as any why engaging in labeling (particularly negative one) can be detrimental to discourse, regardless of context. Apologies.