> You aren't engaging with any of my points, just repeating the dogma - which helps proves my point. Frankly, I think we're all very tired of engaging with ant

> You aren't engaging with any of my points, just repeating the dogma - which helps proves my point. Frankly, I think we're all very tired of engaging with anti-Covid response points which have been debunked to hell and back, and then back to hell again. Scientific evidence is not "dogma" just because you, intuitively, disagree with it. That's fine. The real world does not follow very simple logical frameworks. It's complex, it's messy. Was our, or anyone's, Covid response perfect? Of course not. But this was a novel disease, one and in which our understanding of it changed day by day. Read that a few times over and you'll begin to understand why we did what we did.