> This is a nuclear bomb sized development if it's true that all ChatGPT chats will be released to NYTimes lawyers to comb through Just to be clear, what NY Ti

> This is a nuclear bomb sized development if it's true that all ChatGPT chats will be released to NYTimes lawyers to comb through Just to be clear, what NY Times lawyers means in this situation is the outside lawyers that the Times has hired to litigate this case. Lawyers that actually work at the Times won't get access. Not will non-lawyers who work at the Times. The outside lawyers might also hire experts to help them understand and assess the information. Those experts might get access subject to court approval. ChatGPT would have a chance to challenge the choice of experts. The way access works typically is that the lawyers for the side providing the data (ChatGPT in this case) will set aside a room in their offices (or someplace they've rented specifically for this litigation) that contains a computer and storage with all the data, does not have internet access, and is locked. The other side has to come and be let into the room to look at the data, and can't take copies with them when they leave.