2 ms·

There's nothing especially wrong with using an existing backend design and transitioning it to another ISA; a number of teams did that from mips->arm and had su

by ajb 1y ago

There's nothing especially wrong with using an existing backend design and transitioning it to another ISA; a number of teams did that from mips->arm and had success with the result. Of course, if you ship too early you may be missing some features.

monocasa 1y ago
> a number of teams did that from mips->arm and had success with the result. Do you have any examples? Apple Silicon cores took pieces of the pwerficient cores, and everything else I know of either tweaked an official ARM design or started more or less from scratch.
- ajb 1y ago
  Here is one: https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/cavium/microarchitectures/vulcan https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/cavium/microarchitectures/vulca... I don't know the details of how much rework they had to do. As I understand it cavium still sells processors but only directly to hyperscalers. Ironically Cavium may have gone through the same process with their previous design, but given that they then acquired this one from broadcom, perhaps it didn't go very well! I have no concrete information though.