3 ms·
Their plan is to offer hosted products, as described in their current job openings: https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/astral/a357ab40-9da5-4474-acc7-5888804c69ac https:/
by pamelafox 1y ago
Their plan is to offer hosted products, as described in their current job openings:
https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/astral/a357ab40-9da5-4474-acc7-5888804c69ac https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/astral/a357ab40-9da5-4474-acc7-5888...
We'll see if that works out for them, but I also worked with their founder Charlie previously at Khan Academy, and I trust he sincerely wants to make that work.
That makes sense, that they're bottle-necked elsewhere as well.
For my current CI runs on Microsoft sample repos, mypy and Playwright are the two big time-takers, and since I run the CI on a matrix of Python versions, OSes, and Node versions, I do want it to be quite fast. You can see the timing here:
https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-search-openai-demo/actions/runs/16153269473/job/45589577738 https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-search-openai-demo/ac...
- mike_hearn 1y agoYeah, for sample apps it makes sense that linting and type checking would be a much bigger part of the overall time. The tests only take 50 seconds to run whereas it takes 2-3 minutes for type checking! I can see why they can make a business out of optimizing that. I wonder if GraalPy executes it faster. It backs up my point about how much low hanging fruit is out there though. Every point in the matrix re-does linting and type checking, although presumably it's only needed once.