> First of all, the NYT article did NOT claim that the central Texas floods are the result of climate change, and for sure it did not claim that there is any ev

> First of all, the NYT article did NOT claim that the central Texas floods are the result of climate change, and for sure it did not claim that there is any evidence for it. Honesty I was close to pointing this out but decided to make the most “benefit of the doubt” argument possible.