But that's not what your article was about! First, relax. No need for name calling (in your earlier comment), no need for getting overly excited with exclamati

But that's not what your article was about! First, relax. No need for name calling (in your earlier comment), no need for getting overly excited with exclamation marks. Maybe there's a case to be made for better authorship and I welcome feedback, but as an honest suggestion please read http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html. It is very helpful as a guideline for making constructive criticism. Second, different reasons for why the principle doesn't hold water resonate with different people. If it doesn't resonate with you because some other reasons seem to you more profound then please add to the discussion (as you've done in different comments), just be wary to do it well even when very passionate about the subject.