3 ms·
Yes, we know, your groundbreaking AI startup is the future and it changes everything and it's going to take the world by storm and every company on earth will b
by bakugo 1y ago
Yes, we know, your groundbreaking AI startup is the future and it changes everything and it's going to take the world by storm and every company on earth will be using your technology by the end of the decade, just like every other tech startup ever. Save it for the VCs.
> gatekeeping what games even are by using vague qualifiers like "actual"
I really shouldn't need to define this, but "actual" games have gameplay. Slowly moving a character in an AI generated "world" that melts around him, doesn't obey any laws of physics, has no well defined mechanics and generally doesn't make any sense doesn't count as gameplay in my eyes, and I don't think that's a controversial opinion.
Once this "technology" allows me to play a real game, with real mechanics that make sense, that isn't just a dream-like version of an existing popular game, then you can call it an "amazing new avenue of creative possibilities." Until then, it's just a gimmick that doesn't serve much of a purpose beyond impressing the uneducated for a few minutes.
- soulofmischief 1y agoThis is a hell of a lot of bias and assumptions. I don't think you have any desire to have a fair conversation about this, you're just using this conversation as a soapbox to yell at the sky about things you don't understand. Your comment is so riddled with strawmans, hypotheticals, gatekeeping, insults and accusations, I don't think there is any value to be had talking to someone in your state. Once you understand this technology better and lose the bad attitude, maybe we can try this again.
- bakugo 1y agoThis is the most childishly pretentious way of saying "I've lost the argument so I'm just going to insult you" I've ever seen, congratulations.
- soulofmischief 1y agoMy calling out your ad hominem and straw man, gatekeeping, etc. is not insulting you. I said nothing that should be insulting. And there is nothing wrong with refusing to engage with a bad faith argument that is riddled with fallacies. Now you're calling me childish and pretentious, is this how you usually respond to criticism of your argumentative approach? To me this looks like projection. Discussions are not about winning or losing, and you shouldn't approach them in such an antagonistic manner. Again, if you want to actually address my prior argument without insults, fallacies or deflection, then let's get back on track. Otherwise, you're continuing to be aggressive and I will again suggest that we end this discussion here.
- bakugo 1y agoSeems like you were unable to understand my comment and were left confused and angered. I don't think there is any value to be had talking to someone in your state. Once you're capable of understanding what I say better and lose the bad attitude, maybe we can try this again.
- soulofmischief 1y agoWho's being childish now? Have a good day.