>“copyright infringement” Throwing around scary words means very little. You're using a highly unorthodox interpretation of that concept. Even the anti-AI laws

>“copyright infringement” Throwing around scary words means very little. You're using a highly unorthodox interpretation of that concept. Even the anti-AI lawsuits are typically focused on specific model outputs or some other technicality. >entities like Disney The same company that's now publishing papers on generative AI? See the HN front page right now. >keep their work behind login/paywalls moving forward At what cost? Raging against a new technology like this is sure to backfire. Not only are you crippling yourself in terms of regular search engine visibility, there's now a non-negligible amount of traffic coming from AI search. And the average person will have even less of a reason to interact with you. Logins/paywalls are a nuisance. Especially if AI is producing competitive results to whatever you have to offer.