3 ms·
You're pointing out something a lot of people feel but don’t always say out loud — ChatGPT just isn’t built for organizing or managing writing over time. It’s g
by Bluestein 1y ago
You're pointing out something a lot of people feel but don’t always say out loud — ChatGPT just isn’t built for organizing or managing writing over time. It’s great for brainstorming, writing help, or getting ideas down fast, but once you’ve had a few long conversations, everything starts to blur together. Students end up with dozens or even hundreds of chats, none of which are easy to search, organize, or return to later. It’s like having a giant pile of sticky notes and no folders. Some try to deal with it by copying everything into Google Docs or Notion, but that gets messy fast, especially when it’s done after the fact and without much structure.-
The core issue is that ChatGPT treats each conversation like a throwaway. Even if the content is valuable, it’s not saved like a document — there’s no real sense of “this is my project on climate change” or “this is the story I’m working on.” It’s just one long chat thread, and everything lives in a running timeline. You can rename a chat, sure, but that doesn’t make it feel like a proper file. There’s no version history, no folders, no tags, and no way to mark drafts or track progress. So students end up scrolling endlessly, trying to remember where they talked about that one idea or how they phrased something two weeks ago.-
Some of them are getting creative with workarounds. They paste stuff into apps like Notion or Docs, or save the shareable ChatGPT links in bookmarks or files, but even then it’s easy to lose track. And sometimes those links break or just vanish from memory. It’s frustrating because the content is often really useful — but there’s no good system for keeping it organized.-
What would really help is if ChatGPT had a proper “document mode.” or Artifacts like Anthropoc has. Something where you could start a new piece of writing, name it, organize it into sections, come back to it later, and keep working on it like a real file. You could still get AI help inside the doc, but it would feel more like working in a word processor than chatting in a messaging app. Until that happens, the best move is probably to treat ChatGPT as the rough draft stage and move things into a better tool once the ideas are solid. Asking it to clean up or summarize a full session before copying it out can help a lot too. But yeah — it’s time tools like this started working more like long-term writing partners and less like disposable chat threads.-
- the_other 1y agoWouldn't an "LLM-enabled word processor" be a better UX, and a better factoring of the resources? Rather than expecting the LLM companies to also provide the best UX for every LLM use case, surely it's better to have tailored applications and OSs (and all the domain expertise that comes with them) managed by people/companies/teams that want to specialise in those domains. Copilot, but for essays & articles.
- soco 1y agoI wouldn't necessarily say "better" but as we can see, it definitely has its place. I would use it right now.
- scoot 1y ago> there’s no real sense of “this is my project on climate change” or “this is the story I’m working on.” It’s just one long chat thread perplexity.ai (a meta-ai) partly solves that problem by at least allowing you to group chats in "Spaces" (effectively folders). It lacks some of the other features you suggested though.