4 ms·
>I really feel for the Wachoskis. They couldn't not do a sequel, but they had nowhere to go--The Matrix was already perfect. That is why the 4th is the best of
by slg 1y ago
>I really feel for the Wachoskis. They couldn't not do a sequel, but they had nowhere to go--The Matrix was already perfect.
That is why the 4th is the best of the three sequels, it is specifically about this. Although I agree it still can't match the first movie.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- 4gotunameagain 1y agoThe 4th is a disgrace. It completely defiles the legacy of the Matrix. I've never seen more people leave a cinema before. I wish I'd left too.
- slg 1y agoPeople were disappointed because they wanted just another rehash of The Matrix, but why do that when The Matrix already exists? The more interesting idea is to explore why people wanted another rehash of The Matrix, so the movie is about that instead.
- 4gotunameagain 1y agoI disagree. Nothing of value could be added through the contemporary lens. So leave it at that, no need for a new cash grab. It's not like Warner Bros is poor anyway..
- slg 1y agoI find this mindset funny because the movie is about this exact idea so by saying this idea has no value you are criticizing your own opinion.
- 4gotunameagain 1y agoThey could've made a generic meta movie about that topic, there was absolutely no reason whatsoever to defile the legacy of the Matrix. You sound like you're one of the Wachowski's ? I've seen you in berghain ;)