> This presumes the journalists are somehow neutral to begin with I don't think it presumes that, I'm just pointing out that the existence of articles reportin

> This presumes the journalists are somehow neutral to begin with I don't think it presumes that, I'm just pointing out that the existence of articles reporting on Israeli war crimes doesn't preclude bias. > How do you define what the neutral version of the headline should be? I don't really believe that true neutrality exists, we're always exposed to biases. Which and to what degree are at question here. My hypothetical headline was specifically meant to highlight this - the same events can be reported on "accurately" in many ways, with many biases. The existence of those facts in a newspaper doesn't mean there's no bias. That's all.