3 ms·
It seems plausible to me that a new distribution model could be borne from this tech. With a few large-scale 3D printing sites deployed geographically, delivery
by clebio 14y ago
It seems plausible to me that a new distribution model could be borne from this tech. With a few large-scale 3D printing sites deployed geographically, delivery times for products drop to next-day or so. Alternatively, a community-based or government-sourced set of facilities allows for arbitrary production of items (replacement parts for washing machines, light-rail components, etc.). Manufacturing might not be as tied to volume-of-scale issues, so that bespoke articles are still inexpensive. It's conceivable as well that parts for obsolesced machines could still be produced (my previous oven need just a heating unit, but the whole thing had to be replaced since none were available).
With knowing admittedly little about the field, I'm hopeful that the issue of producing multi-material or bonded objects is tractable. Current 3D printers are akin to black-and-white dot-matrix machines. Nowadays, we have photo-realistic full-color desktop printers (which are given away for free at this point).
I'm very excited about this technology, as it seems to have very practical (and marketable) uses that we're only beginning to touch on.
- shabble 14y agoI think for at least a while the fab technology is going to require quite a few integration/finishing steps, which will still require specialised machinery which prevents them from being easily deployed in neighbourhood Fab4U scenarios. I have a vague recollection that the biggest industrial use of 3D printing is in producing the moulds and dies which are then used to mass-produce. In the longer term, we'll need either more accurate initial positive machining processes, or more integrated systems that include negative processes like CNC milling/EDM/waterjet for cleanup and hard-to-print forms like screw threads.
- clebio 14y agoYes, that's always been my nagging concern about 3D printing. Sure, it can print any single thing, but nearly every machine is made up of multiple parts. So either there's a set of construction machines down the line from the 3D printer, or 'some assembly required'. The related consideration is that each part of a constructed item has to be printed separately (and probably serially). Another issue that occurred to me when typing the earlier comment was, what about the inside of a hollow piece. I know there's camera+software setups that can generate a CAD-like model of anything based on a set of photos, but how would they determine internal structure. Seems like those systems would have to be augmented with an additional, small flexible camera that can image the inside of the object.