3 ms·

This just went on forever and I quit caring, but he does have a point about the Sally Forth cartoonist not being any good at all at portraying emotion. I also

This just went on forever and I quit caring, but he does have a point about the Sally Forth cartoonist not being any good at all at portraying emotion. I also wonder, is it really plagiarism? What is anyone supposed to say and do when they discover a break-in, cartoon character or not? Nor are there any Sally Forth children worried about the fate of their stuffed tigers. This is the real point of the Calvin and Hobbes panel, and it's not even hinted at in the Sally Forth panel.

tanaros 1y ago
If you look at the side-by-side [1], it looks pretty plagiarized to me. They changed the words a bit but the overall plot and themes are essentially identical. [1] https://viruscomix.com/evidence.png https://viruscomix.com/evidence.png
ahazred8ta 1y ago
As opposed to actual parody of Calvin and Hobbes (... the originals) https://web.archive.org/web/20161020011740/https://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/712/658/a83.jpg https://web.archive.org/web/20161020011740/https://i1.kym-cd...