2 ms·
because our industry would improve massively if we actually removed a barrier to allowing standardized licensure I also never said it should be held behind a d
by no_wizard 1y ago
because our industry would improve massively if we actually removed a barrier to allowing standardized licensure
I also never said it should be held behind a degree, instead I said a fee, which could be sponsored. No degree required, though one certainly would help I imagine.
We live in a society, and we should think beyond the individual in terms of benefits. This would be a big win for society.
- FpUser 1y ago>"because our industry would improve massively if we actually removed a barrier to allowing standardized licensure" I call BS on that but each one of course is entitled to their own opinion. Go get your license if you don't have one already. >"..instead I said a fee, which could be sponsored. No degree required, though one certainly would help I imagine." We have enough mafia type bloodsuckers. My take on those money collectors: go fuck yourselves. >"We live in a society, and we should think beyond the individual in terms of benefits. This would be a big win for society." And who would be thinking? Our masters looking to squeeze yet more money from people? Enough of that "won't anyone think of children" vomit.