> This is a pretty clear statement on normativity. I disagree – it's a technical remark on redundancy of fields (this is related to my hypothesis in the articl

> This is a pretty clear statement on normativity. I disagree – it's a technical remark on redundancy of fields (this is related to my hypothesis in the article that redundancy in formats is the primary cause of parser discrepancy). It doesn't acknowledge InfoZIP being canonical in any way. > You also left out an important part of my comment when you quoted it. (The operative word at the front of the sentence is "seems".) Fair, though my point still stands.