3 ms·

The video seems to be an animated retelling of a 2021 blog post, so I'll just link to the post itself: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/PZtsoaoSLpKjjbMqM/the-ca

The video seems to be an animated retelling of a 2021 blog post, so I'll just link to the post itself: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/PZtsoaoSLpKjjbMqM/the-case-for-aligning-narrowly-superhuman-models https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/PZtsoaoSLpKjjbMqM/the-case-f... There's some extra commentary from the reviewers of earlier drafts here: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/AyfDnnAdjG7HHeD3d/miri-comments-on-cotra-s-case-for-aligning-narrowly https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/AyfDnnAdjG7HHeD3d/miri-comme... I've skimmed both of these - this is some substantial and pretty insightful reading (though 2021 was ages ago - especially now that AI safety stopped being a purely theoretical field). However, as of now, I can't really see the connections between the points being discussed there, and anything you tried to explain or communicate. Could you spell out the connection for us please?

alganet 1y ago
I just did. By pretending to know less of egyptian culture and the academic consensus around it, I played the role of a typical human (not trained to prompt, not smart enough to catch bullshit from the LLM). I then compared the LLM output with real information from specialists, and pointed out the mistakes. Your attempt at discrediting me revolves around trying to estabilish that my specialist information is not good, that ancient aliens is actually fine. I think that's hilarious. More importantly, I recognize the LLMs failing, you don't. I don't consider them to be good enough for a gullable audience. That should be a big sign of what's going on here, but you're ignoring it.