3 ms·

Thanks for pointing that out. Obviously I hadn't read the whole article. That is an interesting determination the judge made: > Alsup ruled that Anthropic's us

Thanks for pointing that out. Obviously I hadn't read the whole article. That is an interesting determination the judge made: > Alsup ruled that Anthropic's use of copyrighted books to train its AI models was "exceedingly transformative" and qualified as fair use, a legal doctrine that allows certain uses of copyrighted works without the copyright owner's permission.

JoeAltmaier 1y ago
There are still questions: is an AI a 'user' in the copyright sense? Or even, is an individual operating within the law as fair use, the same as a voracious all-consuming AI training bot consuming everything the same in spirit? Consider a single person in a National Park, allowed to pick and eat berries, compared to bringing a combine harvester to take it all.