3 ms·
By this interpretation pretty much any attraction that isn't brand new is covered, which would entirely dilute your main claim of describing it as referring to
by vidarh 1y ago
By this interpretation pretty much any attraction that isn't brand new is covered, which would entirely dilute your main claim of describing it as referring to ancient monuments or "fornminne". "Fornminne" has a specific meaning and certainly would not generally be applied to a relatively modern place of "historical" interest in Norwegian, nor would it e.g. refer to natural formations.
The other 5 are for narrower, more specific use, and demonstrate quite clearly that the word "severdighet" in Norwegian has nothing specifically to do with historical interest. When you then try to insist that the general, catch-all sign does it feels intentionally obtuse.
To make this clear, here's an example of a sign to INSPIRIA Science Center[1], built in 2011.
https://g.acdn.no/obscura/API/dynamic/r1/ece5/tr_1200_1200_s_f/0000/sarp/2017/4/19/12/Skilt%2BInspiria.jpg?chk=DDDAFB https://g.acdn.no/obscura/API/dynamic/r1/ece5/tr_1200_1200_s...