3 ms·

Is your benchmark trustworthy? I see strange discrepancy: my "old" i7-12700K vs i7-13700K: Games: 170 vs 270 Software: 271 vs 1875 (!!!) I can believe into 1

• onli 1y ago
  I see how that can be misleading. It's globally not a percentage based score. The benchmark is creating a global order based on which one is faster, including indirect comparisons. But that only takes care of the position, not the rating. That one is based on the percentage between direct neighbor iff there is a direct comparison in the benchmark data, otherwise it's a small .1 increment. So many small percentage increases that don't necessarily match the direct comparion between parts that are not neighbors. Sometimes that works great, sometimes not. Here the example looks a bit pathological, that difference is further off than I expected when introducing the calculation recently. For the 12700K and 13700K, the direct comparison sees the 12700K at 85% of the 13700k: https://www.pc-kombo.com/us/benchmark/games/cpu/compare?ids%5B%5D=Intel+Core+i7-12700KF&ids%5B%5D=Intel+Core+i7-13700KF#markdown https://www.pc-kombo.com/us/benchmark/games/cpu/compare?ids%... For apps it's 79%: https://www.pc-kombo.com/us/benchmark/apps/cpu/compare?ids[]=Intel+Core+i7-12700KF&ids[]=Intel+Core+i7-13700KF#markdown https://www.pc-kombo.com/us/benchmark/apps/cpu/compare?ids[]... So yeah, sorry, that part is misleading right now. I'll check the calculation. But the ingested individual benchmark numbers and the ranking, so the position, is very solid I'd say. With the caveat that ranking position can change with more data.
• onli 1y ago
  I found a bug in the score calculation that inflated the score, this case is closer now.