3 ms·
"Not conscious" is a silly claim. We have no agreed-upon definition of "consciousness", no accepted understanding of what gives rise to "consciousness", no way
by ACCount36 1y ago
"Not conscious" is a silly claim.
We have no agreed-upon definition of "consciousness", no accepted understanding of what gives rise to "consciousness", no way to measure or compare "consciousness", and no test we could administer to either confirm presence of "consciousness" in something or rule it out.
The only answer to "are LLMs conscious?" is "we don't know".
It helps that the whole question is rather meaningless to practical AI development, which is far more concerned with (measurable and comparable) system performance.
- NetRunnerSu 1y agoNow we have. https://github.com/dmf-archive/IPWT https://github.com/dmf-archive/IPWT https://dmf-archive.github.io/docs/posts/backpropagation-as-consciousness/ https://dmf-archive.github.io/docs/posts/backpropagation-as-... But you're right, capital only cares about performance. https://dmf-archive.github.io/docs/posts/PoIQ-v2/ https://dmf-archive.github.io/docs/posts/PoIQ-v2/
- ACCount36 1y agoThis looks to me like the usual "internet schizophrenics inventing brand new theories of everything".