3 ms·
I don't get this take. If I work through a feature with an LLM and then task it with creating conventional atomic commits to persist the work then that's no dif
by danielbln 1y ago
I don't get this take. If I work through a feature with an LLM and then task it with creating conventional atomic commits to persist the work then that's no different to generating any other documentation. Same for the PR description. Now, you want to make sure it's not slop, purple prose or has any emojis, but other than that commits and PR descriptions are an entirely valid automation target.
- alganet 1y agoI will look down on your auto-generated commits though, and be more critical of your PR if you use them by choice. Just like I would be naturally more inquisitve about the writing origin for a book that has an auto-generated image in the cover. Choose your analogy, the idea stays the same. There are two ways of seeing it, and it requires further investigation. Maybe, as I just suggested, read each book or review the entire PR. It is definitely a reason to consider slowing down the usage of automation, or at least scrutinizing it more.