4 ms·

what a strawman. its not about "you cannot draw this" but its more like "please dont use dyes that offgas deadly fumes", a technical regulation not about substa

• donatj 1y ago
  Talk about strawman, it's literally "I paid for something I don't like, there should be a law!" And you're comparing it to poison gas
  • jjulius 1y ago
    >... it's literally "I paid for something I don't like, there should be a law!" Is this entirely the fault of the customer, or is it that the studios have largely forced this model upon customers, leaving them with little choice?
  • artemonster 1y ago
    this was not a literal comparison, wtf, but an example of a technical limitation that will be imposed by law as a counter to your "art" stupidity. You can Use alternative formulation if you cant comprehend basic methaphors: „stop using dyes that decay in 2 months“
  • shminge 1y ago
    >... it's literally "I paid for something I don't like, there should be a law!" It's much more like "I paid for something, there should be a law so no one can take what I've paid for"
  • mainde 1y ago
    IMHO the incentives are disproportionately in favour of everyone doing something that hurts consumers (= "something that I don't like"), thus regulation in favour of consumer rights is appropriate. There isn't a scenario where, at scale, someone can offer a product that respects consumer rights and is successful, because it's too profitable to not respect consumer rights just like it wasn't in many other cases.