4 ms·
People in general don't have the time or inclination to properly study the important details of each an every issue, before voting on them. That's why it makes
by vanviegen 1y ago
People in general don't have the time or inclination to properly study the important details of each an every issue, before voting on them.
That's why it makes sense to outsource the decision making to a group of people that are being paid to study these issues full-time.
Given some balanced (yes, there's a problem) expert advice, I think rando's might make better choices than career politicians focussed on extending their power. The rando's would just return to their old careers afterwards.
- PicassoCTs 1y agoPeople though have studied other people. So, vote-forwarding to those who studied, convinced by life-style or example would allow for the votes to propagate to local experts, who then could make the decision as outlined above. If the expert is wrong, the local personality-cult reveals a fraud, that propagation web of votes would with draw and propagate towards new experts.