3 ms·
> ...of course? No, it isn't. That sounds strange, right? But here is an explanation what eternauta3k probably meant: In modern physics, there is a kind of c
by tralarpa 1y ago
> ...of course?
No, it isn't. That sounds strange, right? But here is an explanation what
eternauta3k probably meant: In modern physics, there is a kind of consensus that asking “why” has often been inappropriate or even misleading and should be therefore left to philosophers. The real questions are: Does our current model describe all observations? If not, can we find a model that does? And, even better, can that new model make predictions that we can verify?
- mensetmanusman 1y agoNewton’s title has philosophy in it. It’s probably a modern error to separate all the fields and ignore philosophy when doing science etc and vice versa.
- thaumasiotes 1y ago> The real questions are: Does our current model describe all observations? If not, can we find a model that does? And, even better, can that new model make predictions that we can verify? But every prediction your model can make comes from a "why" question that the model answers.