3 ms·
So this article is a whole load of misconceptions all the way down. It whitters on about the dollar supply being inflationary, then talks about gold standards.
by KaiserPro 1y ago
So this article is a whole load of misconceptions all the way down.
It whitters on about the dollar supply being inflationary, then talks about gold standards.
THe whole point of abandoning the gold standard is to stop deflationary shocks.
But.
THe very act of creating stable coins is inflationary, as it increases the dollar supply[1]. The only difference is that (unless the "genius" act changes that) when a convertible coin crashes, there's no bailout mechanism.
[1] When someone buys a stable coin, they give the "banker" a $1 in exchange for a thing that is "worth" a dollar. The "banker" can, if they are careful, then re-spend that dollar. The token can be exchanged for goods/services worth $1. thus the money can be spent twice.
Of course this is also how investment banks work.
TLDR stable coins are not gold standard, and never were.
- Synaesthesia 1y agoAnd inflationary money is not a bad thing. If the economy grows, the money supply can grow without it being devalued. For instance the Chinese money supply has grown enormously since the 90s, but the currency is still quite stable.
- KaiserPro 1y agoindeed! deflation and debt is a nasty nasty thing that causes a vicious feedback loop. Also, as you point out a fixed money supply would have caused painful distortions in the Chinese economy, as the yuan grew in value (like 0.00001yuan for a cup of tea)