The article does not make sense i.e. in a way a econ or fed watcher off the street could agree with or reject. But it has enough planks in the marketing of sta

The article does not make sense i.e. in a way a econ or fed watcher off the street could agree with or reject. But it has enough planks in the marketing of stable coins by presenting it as close to power, growing in power, and because of that is in the throws of pains as it semi directly plus semi indirectly becomes bigger than visa + Mastercard and as it area-51-x-files its way into taking over the world as the alter ego to the usd reserve currency. If it took place in 1785s and was in French it's the kind of close to power intrigue that yields the diamond necklace affair. Frankly, the French are better at telling stories. This is a political marketing piece whether or not the op meant it or not.