5 ms·
Your characterization is under-exaggerated to make this problem sound normal. It's not. > Every time we see a Google Pixel, we suspect it might belong to a dru
by soraminazuki 1y ago
Your characterization is under-exaggerated to make this problem sound normal. It's not.
> Every time we see a Google Pixel, we suspect it might belong to a drug dealer
Being a Pixel or GrapheneOS user should never be a "clue" of criminality. It should never result in police detaining you or rummaging through your phone. Any police that acts in this way is indeed an "idiot."
- skybrian 1y agoIt would be if they did that, and maybe they do, but the article doesn't say they do that. You've added your own assumption.
- soraminazuki 1y agoOf course they do. What else do you think they're going to do? Keep their "suspicions" to themselves? > Every time we see a Google Pixel, we suspect it might belong to a drug dealer This means something, you know.
- skybrian 1y agoI don't know what specifically it means because I don't know how law enforcement works in Spain. Do you? It seems like you're asking me to imagine something, but I'm not taking the bait. I'm not going to confuse imagining things with having evidence for them.
- soraminazuki 1y agoIt at the very least means people with Pixels or GrapheneOS are treated unfairly by law enforcement. It's unfair because owning either of those is in no way indicative of a crime. You can't possibly IANAL your way out of this fact. It's rich to accuse others of "baiting" while engaging in sealioning. I'm not the one trying to strip all meaning from words. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning