Objective or not, he raises some good points, namely that the book's author isn't very objective herself, by engaging in cherrypicking of the worst companies to

Objective or not, he raises some good points, namely that the book's author isn't very objective herself, by engaging in cherrypicking of the worst companies to make her point. Sure, some editorial discretion might be justified when choosing examples for a book, but this style of argumentation is as rigorous as arguing that vaccines are bad by bringing up all the worst cases of side effects.