AMD`s business and technology development failed. Athlon era: 1) Got HyperTransport - correct 2) Memory controller/north bridge into CPU - correct 3) lower

AMD`s business and technology development failed. Athlon era: 1) Got HyperTransport - correct 2) Memory controller/north bridge into CPU - correct 3) lower price point than intel They had a better product, at a lower price == market share. Mobile: They missed (as did intel) the ultra-low power/mobile market 1) ARM owns the market here Bulldozer: Made their bet on a high throughput/high latency micro-architecture, which didn`t pay off. So their now stuck with un-competitive technology at a lower price point which to the market == cheap knock off. To make it worse, their process technology is a generation behind intel which increases costs thus eats further at any price discount. GPU: Meanwhile, Intel is eating their "Fusion" style cpu/gpu integration with every release they make. Can`t remember the last time some buzz about AMD fusion but intel HD 2k/3k/4k is in the news all the time. They should have made Pat Gelsinger CEO when he was turned down for the same job at intel.