I don't think it's fraudulent on the level of falsifying data. It's the kind of fraud that only works if the rest of the system it operates in is run by frauds.

I don't think it's fraudulent on the level of falsifying data. It's the kind of fraud that only works if the rest of the system it operates in is run by frauds. A sternly-worded letter and a promise to apply academic consequences to frauds having AI do their job for them seems to be all that's necessary to me.