> This is the thing people should learn to accept > People need to vote with their wallet. Seriously: why? If you think this practice is wrong, and you wouldn

> This is the thing people should learn to accept > People need to vote with their wallet. Seriously: why? If you think this practice is wrong, and you wouldn't participate in it, and you think voting with your wallet isn't utterly futile (i.e. it would cause some companies to change their behaviour) then why is individual, atomised action the only legitimate one? Why is it not legitimate to make a change in the law, as a collective?