You had a fine criticism in the article: that people's claims of success or failure should be accompanied by contextual information, to prevent bad extrapolatio

You had a fine criticism in the article: that people's claims of success or failure should be accompanied by contextual information, to prevent bad extrapolations. But then you title it "Everything around LLMs is still magical and wishful thinking." Was this tongue in cheek? Hyperbole for effect? Because it seems you're saying that when the data comes out, people will realize this was all a fraud. There's a big difference between stating "everything" here is wishful thinking, versus calling for more data to understand the strengths and weaknesses.