3 ms·
No (anti)social for me. I checked photo galleries a while back, with the idea of sharing in a limited way, so that my photos don't end up owned by stock agenci
by k310 1y ago
No (anti)social for me.
I checked photo galleries a while back, with the idea of sharing in a limited way, so that my photos don't end up owned by stock agencies, and I have to hire a small army of lawyers to get them back, or fodder for AI. (see the recent "fair use" of books by buying them, tearing them apart and scanning them. )
The following reviews photo gallery sites, unfortunately, the reviewer owns a site, that ranks #1 on the list. That aside, the article gives an idea what is available, all the way to letting visitors buy prints. I remember an email exchange with Pixieset.
https://picflow.com/blog/best-online-galleries-for-photographers https://picflow.com/blog/best-online-galleries-for-photograp...
I like free tiers, but never let the photos out of home, except sharing via email or (shrunken) as messages. My mail client (Apple) offers to resize photos if the message gets large.
These may be overkill, so sites like smugmug may suffice. I have been taking photos for over 50 years, non-professionally (so it's fun) and always do a quick "best of batch" sort (I tag the photos) and a quick tune up. The jpegs I get (Nikon) are so good, that's all I need to get great results. But I have raw editing apps loaded up. HTH