4 ms·
Apparently somebody did sue a couple years back. Anyone know what happened with the [plaintiff] vs. nVidia lawsuit? EDIT: Plantiff dismissed it. Guessing the
by rkagerer 1y ago
Apparently somebody did sue a couple years back. Anyone know what happened with the [plaintiff] vs. nVidia lawsuit?
EDIT: Plantiff dismissed it. Guessing they settled. Here are the court documents (alternately, shakna's links below include unredacted copies):
https://www.classaction.org/media/plaintiff-v-nvidia-corporation.pdf https://www.classaction.org/media/plaintiff-v-nvidia-corpora...
https://www.classaction.org/media/plaintiff-v-nvidia-corporation-notice-voluntary-dismissal.pdf https://www.classaction.org/media/plaintiff-v-nvidia-corpora...
A GamersNexus article investigating the matter: https://gamersnexus.net/gpus/12vhpwr-dumpster-fire-investigation-contradicting-specs-corner-cutting https://gamersnexus.net/gpus/12vhpwr-dumpster-fire-investiga...
And a video referenced in the original post, describing how the design changed from one that proactively managed current balancing, to simply bundling all the connections together and hoping for the best: https://youtu.be/kb5YzMoVQyw https://youtu.be/kb5YzMoVQyw
- shakna 1y ago> NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice by [name redacted] (Filed on 3/10/2023) (Entered: 03/10/2023) Sounds like it was settled out of court. [0] https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/California_Northern_District_Court/5--22-cv-07090/Genova_v._NVIDIA_Corporation/ https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/California_Northern_Distri...
- middle-aged-man 1y agoDo those mention failing to follow Underwriters Laboratory requirements? I’m curious whether the 5090 package was not following UL requirements. Would that make them even more liable? Part of me believes that the blame here is probably on the manufacturers and that this isn’t a problem with Nvidia corporate.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- autobodie 1y agoGamersNexus ftw as always