I agree about the 50/50 thing. It's about how much Claude helped me, and I use it daily too. I'll give some context, though. - I use OCaml and Python/SQL, on

I agree about the 50/50 thing. It's about how much Claude helped me, and I use it daily too. I'll give some context, though. - I use OCaml and Python/SQL, on two different projects. - Both are single-person. - The first project is a real-time messaging system, the second one is logging a bunch of events in an SQL database. In the first project, Claude has been... underwhelming. It casually uses C idioms, overabuses records and procedural programming, ignores basic stuff about the OCaml standard library, and even gave me some data structures that slowed me down later down the line. It also casuallyies about what functions does. A real example: `Buffer.add_utf_8_uchar` adds the ASCII representation of an utf8 char to a buffer, so it adds something that looks like `\123\456` for non-ascii. I had to scold Claude for using this function to add an utf8 character to a Buffer so many times I've lost count. In the second project, Claude really shined. Making most of the SQL database and moving most of the logic to the SQL engine, writing coherent and readable Python code, etc. I think the main difference is that the first one is an arcane project in an underdog language. The second one is a special case of a common "shovel through lists of stuffs and stuff them in SQL" problem, in the most common language. You basically get what you trained for.