4 ms·
- superficial emotion - cliché phrasing - em dashes - abundant alliteration - all comments suspiciously similar in length - all posts pointing to the same
by Jordan-117 1y ago
- superficial emotion
- cliché phrasing
- em dashes
- abundant alliteration
- all comments suspiciously similar in length
- all posts pointing to the same website
Does HN not have a policy against vapid AI comment spam? If not, it needs one.
edit: It does:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37617714 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37617714
- farts_mckensy 1y agoWatch out, HN. The em dash police are here. Hands up
- careful_ai 1y ago[dead]
- bgwalter 1y agoThis one is funny though. I'd bet on Bing CoPilot, which now always agrees with "AI" concerns because MSFT has probably realized that no one wants "AI" and takes a more cautious approach.
- careful_ai 1y ago[dead]
- careful_ai 1y ago[dead]
- Jordan-117 1y agoReaction to a post at 21:39:36: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44468067 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44468067 Reaction to a different post at 21:40:30: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44468069 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44468069 Fast typist! (Incidentally, both are exactly 59 tokens long)
- careful_ai 1y ago[dead]
- gjm11 1y agoFor what it's worth, I had a similar "that looks like AI writing" response, and it wasn't because it was "too polished". And having looked at the rest of your comment history, the only reason why I'm only at 90% confidence it's all AI-generated rather than 100% is your explicit claims to the contrary. Today's LLMs have a definite style that is, sorry, not the same thing as being "polished", and if your comments have "zero automation involved" then it's quite the extraordinary coincidence how much more like an AI you sound than any other human writer I have ever encountered. And a further coincidence that this very AI-sounding human just happens to be selling services to "unlock Meaningful Business Outcomes With AI".