3 ms·
I don't think modeling this as Author Services = good, LLM = bad (or vice versa) makes for a fruitful conversation, and that (modeling it as such) wasn't my int
by perching_aix 1y ago
I don't think modeling this as Author Services = good, LLM = bad (or vice versa) makes for a fruitful conversation, and that (modeling it as such) wasn't my intention either. I'd definitely expect Author Services to do a better job though, even just based on this much description.
- diggan 1y ago> I'd definitely expect Author Services to do a better job though, even just based on this much description Yeah, me too, but the claim was if "paper authors have the necessary language skills to ascertain" the correctness of the translation. Regardless of how good the LLM or Author Services are, the problem remains the same.
- perching_aix 1y agoRight, that's true. Also scary in its own way. I'm not too big a fan of natural languages - something I voice quite frequently these days I notice :)