4 ms·
GP's comment reads reasonably clear to me: humans fearing orcas might eat them are about as rational as the cat visiting GP's garden, which also seems to be con
by dpassens 1y ago
GP's comment reads reasonably clear to me: humans fearing orcas might eat them are about as rational as the cat visiting GP's garden, which also seems to be convinced GP wants to harm rather than feed it.
- swores 1y agoAh, OK that does now make sense to me, thanks. I think I didn't manage to see that meaning because the comment it was replying to had nothing to do with humans thinking orcas want to eat them, it was about orcas bringing food (like dead fish) to give to the humans. So more like a pet cat bringing a dead mouse to its owner than a cat in the garden fearing that the human wants to eat it?
- shayway 1y agoFor what it's worth I was lost too. Even with the explanation it took a few minutes to fully parse.
- mr_toad 1y agoPeople do, or have eaten cats, mainly when they’re starving. I’m not sure I’d want to be in the water with a starving Orca.
- quickthrowman 1y agoI’d be fine in the water near an orca in the wild as long as there aren’t any seals around. There is one alleged documented attack by non-captive orcas on humans and that guy claims he was near seals at the time. I’d probably be nervous if I was sailing on the Atlantic Iberian coast and saw orcas, they’ve been ramming and pushing rudders and fucking around with sailboats, no thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iberian_orca_attacks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iberian_orca_attacks
- dfxm12 1y agoAt best, it is missing a verb. This is compounded by it's poor grammar (or poor style) and the fact that it is a non-sequitor to the comment it replied to. Someone can get reasonably lost reading it. ETA: swores mentions this in their pastebin