> The context was the strictly technical, which was brought up by another poster. That's fine, but it was not what I took issue with in your response. > It se

> The context was the strictly technical, which was brought up by another poster. That's fine, but it was not what I took issue with in your response. > It serves as an example of an arcade game with good production values, and many supported graphics and sound modes ("expandability"), for a PC of the era, i. e. the outgoing 80s. It serves, to me, as an example of a pretty primitive game given the year the port was released, basic enough to replicate on an 8-bit machine, that likely didn't get a port because it wasn't well known enough in the markets where the Amiga was popular to bother licensing it and too basic to be competitive.