3 ms·
This is really obvious in the town where I live. Older houses are smaller with larger yards, even considering proportions. I have no personal use for a yard or
by pnathan 14y ago
This is really obvious in the town where I live. Older houses are smaller with larger yards, even considering proportions.
I have no personal use for a yard or a giant house. I would rather live in a small house with many acres of space for natural growth for the area (prairie, trees, sagebrush, etc)( I really dislike the "lawn" look. :-)).
My plan is to have a apartment/condo for a time, then - if I have enough career freedom - move to a more rural region where acreage is cheap.
Part of my thought is that we need to design homes to be habitable and extensible. This is very different from the slap-it-up construction suburbs have tended to use. I'd like to be able to modify my own space, add new buildings, etc, as needed. Christopher Alexander talks about this style of building in his writings some.
- ChuckMcM 14y agoI know a couple of people who live like that, they have a pretty spartan condo in San Francisco and then larger places out in Portola in one case and Morgan Hill in the other. My thought is it sounds lovely, if you can afford to keep two places running :-( But maybe an AptBnB kind of thing, work apartment by the week or something.
- pnathan 14y agoI don't see myself with the two-home lifestyle. I have enough issues with multiple computers. Maybe this will change, but I see the house as a home, a place to abide. (Which, incidentally, realigns priorities for debts and expectations: the home isn't an asset, it's not for sale :-) ).