3 ms·
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-science-predictions-prove-too-conservative/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-science-p...
by exe34 1y ago
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-science-predictions-prove-too-conservative/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-science-p...
https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-uns-devastating-climate-change-report-was-too-optimistic/ https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-uns-devastating-climate-...
Old articles. Nowadays I'd say there's an even stronger current against "doomerism", which acts as a force suppressing sufficiently bad news. Don't look up!
- BlueTemplar 1y agoIgnoring the possibility of tipping points with self-reinforcing feedbacks is like playing with matches near a gas station. Of course the doomers have been wrong sometimes, here predicting an ice-free Arctic in September 2015 : https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2013/09/is-the-north-pole-now-ice-free.html https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2013/09/is-the-north-pole-n... But I will still side with their painstaking lists of things that could go wrong, than with the insane mainstream, which mostly acts like they care first and foremost about increasing our supply of matches. See also : https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/post-index/ https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/post-index/