2 ms·
everyone in this thread needs to read this paper: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3411497.3420225 https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3411497.3420225 Where’s
by yababa_y 1y ago
everyone in this thread needs to read this paper: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3411497.3420225 https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3411497.3420225
Where’s Waldo as presented isn’t even a proof of knowledge
- edanm 1y agoI think the Where's Waldo example, while not technically zero knowledge, gives a pretty good intuition of the idea behind it. It certainly gives a "layperson" example of being able to prove you know something without revealing it, which isn't the whole definition of ZK but is the idea driving it.