Oh okay, we are indeed in agreement then. > That said, you might be working in a domain where X is fundamentally untrue. Then this is the wrong framework and a

Oh okay, we are indeed in agreement then. > That said, you might be working in a domain where X is fundamentally untrue. Then this is the wrong framework and an experienced practician will go "This is the wrong tool and choose a tool that fits better". Agreed, this is always the money shot. I further think that the holy grail for advancements is for them to lead people's hands in a way that is self-justifying. It's a very tall and cruel order, but I think it's absolutely essential. If a solution fails to do this, people eventually turn on it, and adoption reverts or otherwise falls apart. I'm particularly worried about this happening to e.g. Rust, but this can be applied to basically anything.