3 ms·
Thank you for answering, I haven't seen your rebuke before. It does seem that any issues, even if there would be any (your arguments about CORS headers sound co
by bornfreddy 1y ago
Thank you for answering, I haven't seen your rebuke before. It does seem that any issues, even if there would be any (your arguments about CORS headers sound convincing to me, but I'm not an expert on the subject - I study them every time I need to deal with this) were not a result of using LLM but a conscious decision. So either way, LLM has helped you achieve this result without introducing any bugs that you missed and Mr. Madden found in his review, which sounds impressive.
I won't say that you have converted me, but maybe I'll give LLMs a shot and judge for myself if they can be useful to me. Thanks, and good luck!
- kentonv 1y agoTo be fair, there was a pretty dumb CVE (which had already been found and fixed by the time the project made the rounds on HN): https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-oauth-provider/security/advisories/GHSA-4pc9-x2fx-p7vj https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-oauth-provider/securit... You can certainly make the argument that this demonstrates risks of AI. But I kind of feel like the same bug could very easily have been made by a human coder too, and this is why we have code reviews and security reviews. This exact bug was actually on my list of things to check for in review, I even feel like I remember checking for it, and yet, evidently, I did not, which is pretty embarrassing for me.